http://noharmm.org/separated.htm
http://boysdeservebetter.tumblr.com/
“The fact is,” says Goldman, “when it comes to sex, circumcised men
don’t know what they’re missing.”
But a few do. Increasingly, men who were circumcised as adults (for various medical
reasons) are speaking out against circumcision, providing firsthand accounts of sex before
and after.
“I had ample sexual experience, and I was quite happy as an intact male,”
says Rick Thomas, who was circumcised on advice of his doctor at age 26. “After my
circumcision, that pleasure was utterly gone. On a scale of 10, the uncircumcised penis
experiences pleasure of at least 11 or 12; the circumcised penis is lucky to get to 3. If
men who were circumcised at birth knew the loss of pleasure they would experience, they
would storm the hospitals and not permit their sons to undergo this.”
Douglas MacArthur, a 55-year-old locksmith from Pennsylvania who was also circumcised
as an adult, reports similar problems. “Sex before circumcision was like driving a
luxury car with automatic transmission,” he explains. “I used to just glide
along. Sex now is like driving a tiny, powerless compact with a manual transmission. It
takes a lot of work to get anywhere. My penis has lost 90 percent of its sensitivity.
...
Some medical professionals believe that circumcision for other than religious purposes
would disappear from America if it weren’t covered by insurance. This is what
happened in England, where the circumcision rate prior to World War II was roughly
equivalent to that in the United States. After the war, British doctors could find no
compelling evidence to continue the surgery, and it was dropped from the list of covered
services. Within a decade, the circumcision rate dropped from 50 percent among the working
class and 85 percent among the upper class to less than half a percent in both.
“Why is this procedure still covered by HMOs and health-insurance companies?
The simple answer is, because parents want it,” says Patricia Wald, M.D., regional
coordinating chief of pediatrics for Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in southern
California. There, doctors counsel parents so they’re making an informed decision,
and don’t perform the operation unless asked. “We cover it as a courtesy. But to
me it’s cosmetic surgery, like ear piercing.”
.....
“I didn’t know what circumcision really was when I consented to have my three
sons circumcised,” says Marilyn Milos, founder and executive director of the National
Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers (NOCIRC). “My doctor told
me it was necessary, that it didn’t hurt, and that it took only a moment to
perform-like cutting the umbilical cord, I thought.”
Ten years after her last son was born, Milos went back to school to become a registered
nurse. As a student, she was asked to assist at a circumcision. “To see a part of a
baby’s penis being cut off – without an anesthetic – was devastating.”
Later, while working as a nurse, she made a videotape of the procedure and called it Informed
Consent.
“Parents had no idea what was happening to their baby boys,” she explains.
“The point was to show them what circumcision really entailed.” The hospital,
Marin General in California, refused to allow expectant parents to view the tape.
“They said it was too much for parents to see. I said, ‘Then perhaps it’s
too much for babies to experience.’”
In 1985, Milos founded NOCIRC. “It’s all such an unspeakable cover-up. The
doctors are in denial, so the hospitals are in denial, so the parents are intentionally,
illegally uninformed. Circumcision is the worst fraud in American medical history.”
No comments:
Post a Comment